Ryan Greenblatt roughly estimates that AI software R&D already runs about 4.5 times as fast as with no AI automation at all, and admits being wrong to expect 1.15 to 1.3 times for this year.

Greenblatt derives the 4.5 times from METR's roughly twofold figure as a rough personal estimate on three of the author's own assumptions, and discloses working at METR. Greenblatt writes that only the public report was used and that the comparison is with no AI automation at all. The conversion uses three assumptions: about two-thirds of progress comes from software, each extra year of software progress makes R&D about twice as slow, and the report implies 0.35 to 1.0 extra years of software progress so far. Greenblatt also says this sharply raises the odds of superintelligence within one to two years (Ryan Greenblatt, 2026-11-05). The 4.5 times measures AI software R&D speed, and METR's roughly twofold figure measures model capability growth. Greenblatt's input is METR's own number, so this doesn't count as a second independent source. How we checked →
Source and checks
This item ran in the brief of Nov 6, 2026, alongside 17 other items. How we checked it, the quote checks and what was still missing that day are on that issue's How we checked page.
Cite this item
SecondSource (2026). "Ryan Greenblatt roughly estimates that AI software R&D already runs about 4.5 times as fast as with no AI automation at all, and admits being wrong to expect 1.15 to 1.3 times for this year.." https://secondsource.io/en/expert/2026-11-06-1/. Accessed access date.